Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.19 seconds)Section 141 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Nur Muhammad vs Firm Maulvi Jamil Ahmad on 30 July, 1919
9. Considering the logic of the reasoning which we have indicated above, we are, with great respect, unable to follow the decision in Nur Muhammed v. Maulvi Jamil Ahmad (1919) 52 Ind Cas 688: (AIR 1919 All 213),or Mohammed Abbas Mallik v. Tahera Khatoon, AIR 1974 Pat 324.
Dhulipalla Brahamaramba vs Dhulipalla Seetharamayya And Ors. on 12 December, 1946
See also Chidambaram v. Nataraja Mudaliar, AIR 1939 Mad 80 Dhulipalla Brahamaramba v. Hulipalla Seetharamayya, AIR 1947 Mad 405, Jagadiswari Debi v. Tinkari Bibi, AIR 1936 Cal 28, Bank of Bihar Limited v. Ramachanderji Maharaj, AIR 1929 Pat 637, Totaram Ichharam Wani v. Dattu Mangu Wani, AIR 1943 Bom 143, Mahanath Jaikishun Dass v. Ram Narain Das, AIR 1939 Pat 385, and Raj Narain Sexana v. Bhim Sen, AIR 1966 All 84 (FB).
Totaram Ichharam Wani vs Dattu Mangu Wani on 28 August, 1942
See also Chidambaram v. Nataraja Mudaliar, AIR 1939 Mad 80 Dhulipalla Brahamaramba v. Hulipalla Seetharamayya, AIR 1947 Mad 405, Jagadiswari Debi v. Tinkari Bibi, AIR 1936 Cal 28, Bank of Bihar Limited v. Ramachanderji Maharaj, AIR 1929 Pat 637, Totaram Ichharam Wani v. Dattu Mangu Wani, AIR 1943 Bom 143, Mahanath Jaikishun Dass v. Ram Narain Das, AIR 1939 Pat 385, and Raj Narain Sexana v. Bhim Sen, AIR 1966 All 84 (FB).
Mohammad Abbas Mallik vs Tahera Khatoon And Ors. on 8 November, 1973
9. Considering the logic of the reasoning which we have indicated above, we are, with great respect, unable to follow the decision in Nur Muhammed v. Maulvi Jamil Ahmad (1919) 52 Ind Cas 688: (AIR 1919 All 213),or Mohammed Abbas Mallik v. Tahera Khatoon, AIR 1974 Pat 324.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Vijay Pratap Singh vs Dukh Haran Nath Singh And Another (And ... on 19 January, 1962
In Vijai Pratap Singh v. Dukh Haran Nath Singh, AIR 1962 SC 941, the Supreme Court pointed out :
The Court-fees Act, 1870
Chidambaram, Minor Represented By His ... vs Nataraja Mudaliar And Ors. on 11 January, 1938
See also Chidambaram v. Nataraja Mudaliar, AIR 1939 Mad 80 Dhulipalla Brahamaramba v. Hulipalla Seetharamayya, AIR 1947 Mad 405, Jagadiswari Debi v. Tinkari Bibi, AIR 1936 Cal 28, Bank of Bihar Limited v. Ramachanderji Maharaj, AIR 1929 Pat 637, Totaram Ichharam Wani v. Dattu Mangu Wani, AIR 1943 Bom 143, Mahanath Jaikishun Dass v. Ram Narain Das, AIR 1939 Pat 385, and Raj Narain Sexana v. Bhim Sen, AIR 1966 All 84 (FB).