Section 3 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
presented to the proper officer; (ii) in the case of a pauper, when his application for leave to sue as a pauper is made
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 3548 (1.05 seconds)Section 13 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
time in cases where leave to sue or appeal as a pauper is applied for.—
In computing the period of limitation prescribed for any suit ... case where an application for leave to sue or appeal as a pauper has been made and rejected, the time during which the applicant
M. L. Sethi vs R. P. Kapur on 19 July, 1972
what is-Power of Cour. to
order discovery of documents relating to pauperism.
HEADNOTE:
The respondent filed an application for permission to sue in
forma ... Government and the appellant
filed objections, that the respondent was not a pauper. The
appellant also filed an application for discovery of docu-
ments from
Vijay Pratap Singh vs Dukh Haran Nath Singh And Another (And ... on 19 January, 1962
does not apply to a proceeding for
permission to sue as a pauper.
^
Held, that O. XXXIII of the Code of Civil
Procedure lays down ... procedure for institution
of a suit by pauper. By cl. 5 (d) the court is
required to ascertain whether the allegation made
in the petition
Jugal Kishore vs Dhanno Devi (Dead) By L.Rs on 13 August, 1973
Order 7 and
8--Sec. 149 Civil Procedure Code-Pauper application
subsequently with drawn-Enlargment of time by Court for
payment of court fee-Subsequent ... payment of court fee relates
back to the presentation of pauper application and the suit
is deemed to be presented from the date
Section 160 in The Manipur Municipalities Act,1994. [Entire Act]
Section 160 in The Manipur Municipalities Act,1994.
160. Burial of paupers and unclaimed dead bodies.-
The municipality may from time to time ... municipal fund, provide for the burial or burning of paupers and unclaimed dead bodies, free of charge, within the limits of the municipality or otherwise
Raj Narain Saxena vs Bhim Sen And Ors. on 17 May, 1965
party in this judgment, filed against the applicant a suit as a pauper under Order 33 of the Code of Civil Procedure by applying ... permission to sue as a pauper in the
Court of a Munsif. The application was apparently in proper form and was presented by the opposite
Chunna Mal vs Bhagwant Kishore on 11 May, 1936
opposite party filed an application for permission to sue as a pauper on 17th August 1934. There was some inquiry as to his pauperism ... 29th September 1934, the Court held that the applicant was not a pauper and rejected the application with costs. On 1st October 1934 the applicant
Perumal Goundan And Three Ors. vs The Thirumalarayapuram Jananukoola ... on 30 November, 1917
context. Order XXXIII of the Civil Procedure Code refers to suits by paupers and Rule (l) enacts that any suit may, subject to the provisions ... order, be instituted by a pauper and does not exclude official persons. Now a registered company or any other association may be unable
Jyoti Prakash Banerjee vs Chameli Banerjee And Anr. on 10 October, 1974
application made by her for leave to sue as a pauper for maintenance. The main application is still pending. The questions of law raised ... maintenance pendente lite on
an application for leave to sue as a pauper before such leave is granted?
(2) Can an order for maintenance pendente