Maharaja Birendra Kishore Manikya ... vs Akram Ali on 4 January, 1912
In Birendra Kishore Manikya Bahadur v. Akram Ali 13 Ind. Cas.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.31 seconds)Rangasami Gounden vs Nachiappa Gounden on 16 December, 1918
513 : 15 C.L.J. 194 : 39 C. 439 : 16 C.W.N. 304 and Rangasami Gounden v. Nachiappa Gounden 50 Ind. Cas. 498 : 42 M. 523 : 36 M.L.J. 493 : 17 A.L.J. 536 : 29 C.L.J. 539 : 21 Bom. L.R. 640 : 23 C.W.N.777 : (1919) M.W.N. 262 : 26 M.L.T. 5 : 10 L.W. 105 : 461. A. 72 (P.C.) it was laid down as settled law that "he who has the right to complain must do so when the right of action is properly open to him and he knows the facts." We are not able to understand how the present legal representative of the third plaintiff has any different legal character from the third plaintiff himself or any which would enable him to abandon the third plaintiff's contentions in the present proceedings, with which alone we are concerned.
Section 196 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 200 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
1