Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)

Masalti vs State Of U. P on 4 May, 1964

In our view, this aspect is also considered by the learned Sessions Judge in paragraph 51 wherein the Court has held that the presence and assault by A1 to A5 is spoken to by injured eye-witnesses, presence of accused A6 to A8, A10 and A11 is spoken to by PW5, presence of A6 is also spoken to by PW6, presence of A9, A13 and A17 is spoken to by PW2, presence of A15, A16 and A18 is spoken to by PW4, presence of A1, A20 and A22 is spoken to by PW3 and presence of A12 who abetted the offence is spoken to by PW14. PW1 to PW6 have stated the presence of A14, A19 and other acquitted accused, which establishes that the evidence of these witnesses discloses the presence of A1 to A22 in the incident. The learned Sessions Judge has also considered the evidence of each witness assigning specific overt acts to the accused. Considering the chart produced by the learned counsel for the appellants for our perusal and the findings given by the learned Sessions Judge, it cannot be said that the court has not followed the rule of appreciation of evidence in a case where large number of assailants and victims are involved, as laid down by this Court in Masaltis case (Supra). The chart given by the learned counsel clearly indicates that two or more persons have specifically spoken the presence of the accused. Witnesses have given consistent account of the incident and the role played by the individual accused. In this particular case, the injured eyewitnesses have consistently, since beginning, assigned specific role to a particular accused and this aspect has been properly considered by the learned Sessions Judge. In this view of matter, in our view, there is no question of giving benefit of doubt to accused No.14-Tammegowda and accused No.22- Somegowda, as contended by the learned counsel for the appellants. As per the chart, the presence and overt acts of accused No.14-Tammegowda is deposed by PW1 and PW6 and that of accused No.22-Somegowda is established by PW1 and PW3 and that at the relevant time he was having club.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 936 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document
1