Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.33 seconds)Section 129A in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Shri. Payangadi Moidu Mohammed Ali vs The Commissioner Of Appeal-I on 17 December, 2015
10. I have also gone through the judgments cited above. Hon'ble
Madras High Court Judgment and specifically Shri Payangadi Moidu
Mohammed Ali Vs Commissioner of Appeals, The Additional Commissioner
of Customs (AIR) [2017 (2) TMI 84 Madras - HC], I find that the
Tribunals have taken a consistent view that in the matter of Baggage, the
Tribunal has no jurisdiction.
Section 77 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Ahmed Gani Natchiar … vs Office Of Theprincipal Commissioner Of ... on 30 March, 2021
11. The reliance by the Learned Advocate on the case of Ahamed Gani
Natchiar Vs Commissioner of Customs, Chennai [2020 (9) TMI 267
CESTAT-Chennai] would also not help in as much as the Tribunal was
deciding the matter on the direction of the Hon'ble High Court and it was
also noted that the Revenue had not raised this issue of jurisdiction before
the Hon'ble High Court. However, the Learned DR points out that on
appeal by the Revenue against this order of the Tribunal entertaining the
appeal filed by the appellant, the Hon'ble High Court disposed off the
petition by making an observation that in terms of the proviso to Section
129A of the Customs, Act and appeal lies only before Revisionary
Authority and therefore set aside the order of the Tribunal as bad in law.
Therefore, this citation has still not support.
Section 78 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 79 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Shri Payangadi Moidu Mohammed Ali vs Commissioner Of Customs, Chennai on 8 August, 2016
ii) Payangadi Moidu Mohammed Ali Vs Commissioner of Customs,
Chennai [2017 (357) ELT 577 (Tri-Chennai)]
1