Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 57 (0.39 seconds)General Manager, Kerala S.R.T.C vs Susamma Thomas on 6 January, 1993
Section 168 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Sunil Sharma& Ors vs Bachitar Singh & Ors on 7 February, 2011
185. There was no evidence with regard to the deceased‟s income or
his qualification. His income could have been taken only on
the basis of minimum wages payable to an unskilled worker.
The addition of 50% was not permissible for the reasons as
stated earlier. The loss of dependency comes to `5,91,138/-
(`5278 - 1/3 X 12 X 14). The compensation on account of loss
of love and affection is also required to be reduced to `25,000/-
from `75,000/-.(Sunil Sharma v. Bachitar Singh (2011) 11 SCC
425 and Baby Radhika Gupta v. Oriental Insurance Company
Limited (2009) 17 SCC 627).
Baby Radhika Gupta & Ors vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors on 24 November, 2009
185. There was no evidence with regard to the deceased‟s income or
his qualification. His income could have been taken only on
the basis of minimum wages payable to an unskilled worker.
The addition of 50% was not permissible for the reasons as
stated earlier. The loss of dependency comes to `5,91,138/-
(`5278 - 1/3 X 12 X 14). The compensation on account of loss
of love and affection is also required to be reduced to `25,000/-
from `75,000/-.(Sunil Sharma v. Bachitar Singh (2011) 11 SCC
425 and Baby Radhika Gupta v. Oriental Insurance Company
Limited (2009) 17 SCC 627).
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
New India Assurance Co.Ltd. vs Rimjhim Ispat Ltd. & Ors. on 21 February, 2012
and MAC APP.41/2011 titled „New India
Assurance Company Limited v. Rimjhim Ispat Ltd. & Ors., this
Court held as under:-
Section 15 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009
The
appropriate multiplier as per Sarla Verma (supra) was „14‟.