Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.35 seconds)
Sonibai Nathu Kuwar vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 9 June, 2005 cites

A.M. Mathur vs Pramod Kumar Gupta on 22 March, 1990

In the said decision, the Apex Court has also observed that Judges have the absolute and unchallengeable control of the Court domain. But they cannot misuse their authority by intemperate comments, undignified banter or scathing criticism of counsel, parties or witnesses. The Court further observed that concededly the Court has the inherent power to act freely upon its own conviction on any matter coming before it for adjudication, but it is a general principle of the highest importance to the proper administration of justice that derogatory remarks ought not to be made against persons or authorities whose conduct comes into consideration unless it is absolutely necessary for the decision of the case to animadvert on their conduct.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 94 - K J Shetty - Full Document

Niranjan Patnaik vs Sashibhusan Kar & Anr on 11 April, 1986

In yet another case of similar nature, Their Lordships of the Apex Court in the case of Niranjan Patnaik v. Sashibhusan Kar and Anr., , again reminded that the higher the forum and the greater the powers, the greater the need for restraint and the more mellowed the reproach should be. The court again reiterated the settled law that harsh or disparaging remarks are not to be made against persons and authorities whose conduct comes into consideration before Courts of law unless it is really necessary for the decision of the case, as an integral part thereof to animadvert on that conduct.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 113 - V B Eradi - Full Document
1