Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (1.23 seconds)Section 17 in The Coinage Act, 2011 [Entire Act]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 17 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 19 in The Coinage Act, 2011 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Rana Randhir Singh And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 4 November, 1988
In the case of Randheer Singh (supra) the Division Bench of the M.P. High Court has also observed relying upon the above decision of the Hon'ble apex Court that the Hon'ble apex Court in the case of L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India reported in AIR 1997 SC 7725 has nowhere said that the orders of the Tribunal holding the contemnor guilty and punishing him for contempt shall also be subject to judicial scrutiny of the High Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution in spite of remedy of statutory appeal provided by Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act being available.
Section 17 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
T. Sudhakar Prasad vs Govt. Of A.P. & Ors on 13 December, 2000
7. Further both the opposite parties have taken the plea that part of the order which has been quoted above was passed by them on the basis of the decision of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh rendered in the case of Randhir Singh v. State of M.P. reported in 2004 (2) SLR 733 and the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of T. Sudhakar Prasad v. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. reported in 2002(1) SLR 596.