Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.38 seconds)The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
The Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961
Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
M. Sekaran vs The General Manager on 8 December, 2005
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, in support of his submission that once a
Casual Employee is retrenched or ousted from service, he should be given
preference in the light of the provisions of Section 25-H of the I.D.Act, 1947, relied
heavily on the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of M.Sekaran
vs. General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, reported in 2006
(1) MLJ 295, wherein it was held as follows:
Mohan Lal vs Management Of M/S Bharat Electronics ... on 21 April, 1981
21. The Respondents, having allowed the Workman to continue his work
beyond eight hours without any interval and having extracted work beyond the
permitted hours, cannot refuse granting permanency to him in the post, on the
ground that he had not completed the requried number of days, which is in
contravention to the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in Mohan Lal vs Bharat
Electronics Ltd., (supra).