Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.28 seconds)
Parmindar vs State Of Raj And Ors on 19 September, 2022 cites

The State Of Rajasthan vs Love Kush Meena on 24 March, 2021

In view of the above discussion, this writ petition filed by the petitioner deserves to be dismissed; for the reasons, firstly, though the petitioner was acquitted by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 04.05.2016 on the ground of benefit of doubt, but the same in my considered view is not a clean acquittal, secondly, the matter relates to the appointment in Disciplined Security Forces, therefore, the Selection Committee has not committed any illegality in rejecting the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Constable, thirdly, in view of the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Commissioner of Police and Vs. Raj Kumar and State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Love Kush Meena (both supra), I am not inclined to exercise the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 61 - S K Kaul - Full Document

Commissioner Of Police vs Raj Kumar on 25 August, 2021

In view of the above discussion, this writ petition filed by the petitioner deserves to be dismissed; for the reasons, firstly, though the petitioner was acquitted by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 04.05.2016 on the ground of benefit of doubt, but the same in my considered view is not a clean acquittal, secondly, the matter relates to the appointment in Disciplined Security Forces, therefore, the Selection Committee has not committed any illegality in rejecting the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Constable, thirdly, in view of the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Commissioner of Police and Vs. Raj Kumar and State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Love Kush Meena (both supra), I am not inclined to exercise the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 102 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Joginder Singh vs Union Territory Of Chandigarh . on 11 November, 2014

I have heard counsels for the parties and perused the record and also gone through the judgments cited (supra). (D.B. SAW/1251/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders) (Downloaded on 25/12/2022 at 08:52:38 AM) (8 of 9) [CW-12365/2017] The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments in the matter of Commissioner of Police & State of Rajasthan Vs. Love Kush Meena (both supra) had an occasion to take into consideration what has been observed in Avtar Singh's case & Mehar Singh (both supra) and made much emphasis on the point that while considering the candidature of a candidate, the employer has to examine very minutely and in its entirety the criminal antecedents against such candidate before offering appointment, in particular in the disciplined security forces and observed that the police force is a disciplined force and therefore shoulders the great responsibility of maintaining law and order and public order in the society and as the people repose great faith in the police force, therefore it must be worthy of that confidence.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 13 - Cited by 194 - V G Gowda - Full Document

State Of Raj And Ors vs B D Sharma on 4 July, 2012

28. We may note here that the circular dated 28.03.2017 is undoubtedly very wide in its application. It seeks to give the benefit to candidates including those acquitted by the Court by giving benefit of doubt. However, such circular has to be read in the context of the judicial pronouncements and when this Court has repeatedly opined that giving benefit of (D.B. SAW/1251/2022 has been filed in this matter. Please refer the same for further orders) (Downloaded on 25/12/2022 at 08:52:38 AM) (4 of 9) [CW-12365/2017] doubt would not entitle candidate for appointment, despite the circular, the impugned decision of the competent authority dated 23.05.2017 cannot be said to suffer from infirmity as being in violation of the circular when it is in conformity with the law laid down by this Court."
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - A Mishra - Full Document
1