Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.18 seconds)

Chockalingam Pillai And Ors. vs Mayandi Chettiar on 13 August, 1896

Again, in Mayandi Chettiar v. Chokalingam Pillai 31 I.A. 83 : 27 M. 291 : 8 C.W.N. 545 : 19 M.L.J. 200 (P.C.), where their Lordships reversed the decisions of the Madras High Court in Chokalingam Pillai v. Mayandi Chettiar 19 M. 485 : 6 M.L.T. 247, the question was raised whether the transaction evidenced by a muchilika deed was a new grant or a confirmation with modification of a previous grant. Sir Andrew Scoble held that this was a question of the legal effect of the deed on which the title of the parties rested and was a question of law, upon which their Lordships disagreed with the Judges of the High Court.
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 21 - Full Document

Shital Chandra Bairagee vs Manik Chandra Hazra And Ors. on 22 January, 1909

No useful purpose would be served by a detailed examination of all the cases in which the rule laid down by Sir Richard Couch has been strictly applied, but reference may be made, amongst other cases, to the decisions in Shib Chandra v. Chandra Narain 32 C. 719 : 1 C.L.J. 232, Ananda Chandra v. Parbati Nath 4 C.L.J. 198, Dursun Singh v. Durbijoy Singh 1 Ind. Cas.
Calcutta High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1   2 Next