Judge and First Class Subordinate Judge, Jamkhandi, dismissing the decree-holders' darkhast with costs.
2. It appears that one Chunilal Kasturchand Marwadi and another ... brought on record in his place.
3. In execution of the decree, Darkhast No. 418 of 1940 was filed in the Belgaum Court
represented to the Collector that if the land be assigned on Darkhast, it will entail great hardship by depriving ''several cattle of their ... competent to take uognizan6e of the orders passed by Revenue Officers under Darkhast rules" and that the land claimed by the respondent
therein.
3. The applicants/decree holders filed an execution application, being Regular Darkhast No. 19 of 1984, in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division ... parties as such emphasised the necessity of making them parties to the Darkhast application and requested for details in including their names.
5. It appears
plaintiff on March 6, 1929. On April 16, 1929, the plaintiff filed darkhast No. 108 of 1929 against the defendant Martand for possession, mesne profits ... costs. In this darkhast she obtained possession of all the immoveable properties except one house, but no part of the mesne profits was recovered
given before resumption is directed. His contention has been that Darkhast proceedings are proceedings of a quasi-judicial nature, that resumption is a part ... various factors which ought to be taken into consideration while granting of Darkhast. The order made on Datkhast needs to be communicated and then
accordance with the direction of this Court, his son Appaji submitted Darkhast Application No. 10 of 1891 in the District Court at Poona as owner ... male heir of Chintaman, and in that darkhast he prayed for a declaration that the properties mentioned in the annexure to the application were
sons of one Parsharam Mahadev Namjoshi, opponent No. 3 in Darkhast Not 452 of 1937 filed in the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Devrukh ... decree. Default having been committed, Bhagwat, the decree-holder, brought the present darkhast for sale of six of the properties covered by the charge
which confirmed the order of the Civil Judge. Senior Division, Sholapur, in Darkhast No. 883 of 1946.
(2) One Hirachand Gulabchand and his sort Manoranjan ... case. The defendants having failed to satisfy the decree. Manekbai filed a Darkhast No. 833 of 1946 in the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior
holder in depositing the purchase price by 9 days and that the Darkhast No. 124 of 1965 (which was for carrying out the sale ... decree-holder) should proceed.
2. The facts leading to the above Darkhast No. 123 of 1965 are that in Suit No. 70 of 1960 decree
judgment-debtor. On 5th October 1936, the decree-holder filed a darkhast claiming that in view of a default in payment of instalments the whole ... decretal amount bad become payable and claiming that amount. That darkhast was dismissed for non-prosecution on 2lst December 1936. A further darkhast was filed
