Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (2.04 seconds)
M/S Mp24 Construction Company vs State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2025 cites

Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 11 November, 1974

61. The facts of this case come close to the decision of this Court in CE Info Systems Pvt. Ltd. (supra), facts of which have been brought out in detail in earlier part of the judgment. At the cost of repetition, in the said case, the Court was examining an order passed by GAIL debarring the Petitioner from participating in the bidding process for three years basis an allegation that Petitioner had submitted a forged certificate indicating that it had completed certain works for IOCL for a certain value indicated therein. Petitioner did not dispute that the certificate was forged but contended that the same was furnished by its employee, who was not authorized to do so and therefore, there was no warrant for a punitive measure. Petitioner contended inter alia that the forged certificate was not issued by the authorized officer. GAIL, on the other hand, disputed that the forged certificate was not issued by the authorized officer and sought to establish his authorization. It was also contended that Petitioner did not qualify the eligibility criteria but for the forged completion certificate.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 774 - A N Ray - Full Document
1   2 3 Next