Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.49 seconds)
Special Officer, Kancheepuram Central ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Labour ... on 10 July, 1998
cites
Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947
Shankar Chakravarti vs Britannia Biscuit Co.Ltd. & Anr on 4 May, 1979
This point is quoted in Shankar Chakravarti v. Britannia Biscuit Company (supra), wherein it was held that, "it is not the role of a Tribunal to acquaint parties about their rights', and the right of an employer has to be availed "of by it, by making a proper request at the time it files claim statement or written statement, and if a request is made before the proceedings are over, it would ordinarily be granted for adducing evidence. But, if no such request is made at any stage of the proceedings, then there is no duty involved in the Labour Court to give such an opportunity, and failure to give such an opportunity will not vitiate the award."
Employers Of Firestone Tyre And Rubber ... vs Their Workmen on 22 August, 1967
He has relied on, Employers of Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co., (P) Ltd., v. The Workmen .
Secretary, Central Board Of Exciseand ... vs K.S. Mahalingam on 23 April, 1986
16. The next decision referred to by him is reported in Secretary, Central Board of Excise and Customs v. K.S.Mahalingam 1987 Writ Law Reporter 21. He has very much relied on the following observation made in that case:
The United Planters Associationof ... vs K.G. Sangameswaran & Anr on 6 March, 1997
18. Again, with regard to power of the Appellate Authority, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has very much relied on a decision of the Apex Court reported in United Planters Assocn. of Southern India v. K. G.Sangameswaran (1997-I-LLJ-1104). While construing the power of the Appellate Authority under Section 41 of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947, Their Lordships have concluded thus at p. 1110:
Cooper Engineering Limited vs Shri P. P. Mundhe on 20 August, 1975
In the light of the law laid down in the said decision, in the absence of any plea or request by the management to adduce evidence, the ultimate order passed by the Appellate Authority which is impugned in this writ petition cannot be said to be either erroneous or improper.
Salem-Shevapet Sri Venkateswara Bank, ... vs Krishnan (K.K.) And Anr. on 19 August, 1959
The learned Judge also referred to and followed the ratio of Rajagopala Ayyangar, J. (as he then was) in Venkateswara Bank Ltd., Salem v. Krishnan (supra).
The Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Societies Act, 1983
Meenglas Tea Estate vs Its Workmen on 22 February, 1963
In Meenglas Tea Estate v. Its Workmen (supra) in a similar circumstance Their Lordships of the Apex Court have concluded thus at p.394: