Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.22 seconds)Section 61 in The Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 58 in The Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 131 in The Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 62 in The Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Punjab Beverages Pvt. Ltd., Chandigarh vs Suresh Chand And Anr on 21 February, 1978
This Court has adopted the same rule in M. Pentiah v. Veeramallappa Muddala; ; Gamman India Ltd. v. Union of India, , Mysore State Road Transport Corporation v. Mirza Khasim Ali Beg, ; Vaddeboyina Tulsamme v. Vaddeboyina Sesha Reddi, , Punjab Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Chand, ; Commr. of Income-tax v. National Taj Traders, ; Calcutta Gas Co. (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of West Bengal, and J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills v. State of U.P., .
C.I.T. Central, Calcutta vs National Taj Traders on 27 November, 1979
This Court has adopted the same rule in M. Pentiah v. Veeramallappa Muddala; ; Gamman India Ltd. v. Union of India, , Mysore State Road Transport Corporation v. Mirza Khasim Ali Beg, ; Vaddeboyina Tulsamme v. Vaddeboyina Sesha Reddi, , Punjab Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Chand, ; Commr. of Income-tax v. National Taj Traders, ; Calcutta Gas Co. (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of West Bengal, and J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills v. State of U.P., .
Board Of Trustees Of The Port Of Bombay vs Jai Hind Oil Mills Company And Others on 9 January, 1987
8. Mr. Makhija, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that Section 63 reproduced above is a provision which merely sets out the priority according to which the sale proceeds must be applied. It does not limit the petitioner to recover demurrage only for a period of four months from the date of landing. The learned Counsel submits that the scheme of the Act clearly empowers the petitioner to charge and, therefore, recover demurrage and other charges such as wharfage and storage on the basis of a scale of rates framed by the board. It is clear that demurrage is one of the rates which can be fixed and charged by the Board (see Board of Trustees, Port of Bombay v. Jai Hind Oil Mills Co., ).
The J. K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors on 12 December, 1960
This Court has adopted the same rule in M. Pentiah v. Veeramallappa Muddala; ; Gamman India Ltd. v. Union of India, , Mysore State Road Transport Corporation v. Mirza Khasim Ali Beg, ; Vaddeboyina Tulsamme v. Vaddeboyina Sesha Reddi, , Punjab Beverages Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Chand, ; Commr. of Income-tax v. National Taj Traders, ; Calcutta Gas Co. (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of West Bengal, and J.K. Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills v. State of U.P., .