Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.31 seconds)

H.P.Public Service Commission vs Mukesh Thakur & Anr on 25 May, 2010

The view as noted above, has also been reiterated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in a catena of judgments namely Rahul Singh (Supra), Arun Kumar (Supra) and (Downloaded on 07/12/2024 at 12:49:10 AM) [2024:RJ-JP:47575] (40 of 41) [CW-14832/2024] Mukesh Thakur (Supra) and Tajvir Singh Sodhi (Supra) and also, the Division Bench of this Court headed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. M. M. Srivastava as enunciated in Kavita Bhargava (Supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 842 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Vijay Karan Singh vs U.P. State Road Transport Corporation ... on 9 April, 2004

18.2.1 The only exception carved out, permitting the Court's interference in disputed answer keys whilst exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pertains to when the disputed answer key/question-answers appear to be 'palpably and demonstrably erroneous'. 18.2.2 The dictum of the Hon'ble Apex Court, as enunciated in Ran Vijay Singh (Supra) is reproduced herein- under:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 217 - S Ambwani - Full Document

Tajvir Singh Sodhi vs The State Of Jammu And Kashmir on 28 March, 2023

The view as noted above, has also been reiterated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in a catena of judgments namely Rahul Singh (Supra), Arun Kumar (Supra) and (Downloaded on 07/12/2024 at 12:49:10 AM) [2024:RJ-JP:47575] (40 of 41) [CW-14832/2024] Mukesh Thakur (Supra) and Tajvir Singh Sodhi (Supra) and also, the Division Bench of this Court headed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. M. M. Srivastava as enunciated in Kavita Bhargava (Supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 15 - K Joseph - Full Document

Chairman-Cum-Managing Director vs Rahul Singh Sakya on 15 February, 2013

The view as noted above, has also been reiterated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in a catena of judgments namely Rahul Singh (Supra), Arun Kumar (Supra) and (Downloaded on 07/12/2024 at 12:49:10 AM) [2024:RJ-JP:47575] (40 of 41) [CW-14832/2024] Mukesh Thakur (Supra) and Tajvir Singh Sodhi (Supra) and also, the Division Bench of this Court headed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. M. M. Srivastava as enunciated in Kavita Bhargava (Supra).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 110 - Full Document

Bihar Staff Selection Commission . vs Arun Kumar on 6 May, 2020

The view as noted above, has also been reiterated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in a catena of judgments namely Rahul Singh (Supra), Arun Kumar (Supra) and (Downloaded on 07/12/2024 at 12:49:10 AM) [2024:RJ-JP:47575] (40 of 41) [CW-14832/2024] Mukesh Thakur (Supra) and Tajvir Singh Sodhi (Supra) and also, the Division Bench of this Court headed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. M. M. Srivastava as enunciated in Kavita Bhargava (Supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 114 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Kanpur University And Others vs Samir Gupta And Others on 27 September, 1983

18.3.2 While further elaborating upon the test laid down in Kanpur University (Supra), the Hon'ble Apex Court in West Bengal Central School Service Commission and Ors. vs. Abdul Halim reported in (2019) 18 SCC 39 laid down the test to determine whether an answer-key is palpably and demonstrably erroneous. The relevant extract is reproduced herein-under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 633 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document
1   2 3 Next