Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.24 seconds)Section 328 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 504 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 384 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Pandit Ram Narain vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Andothers on 20 September, 1956
At the time of commission of ofence, the appellant-accused was 27
years old youngster. There is no doubt that he is an accused of
heinous and serious anti-social crime. But, in view of his age and
possibility of correction and reformation of the appellant-accused,
we fnd that the learned trial court has exercised the discretion
judicially for determination of quantum of punishment awarded to
the appellant-accused. The Honourable Supreme Court in Ram
Narain Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in AIR 1973 SC
2200, laid down the factors which should be considered in awarding
::: Uploaded on - 19/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 19/04/2020 21:33:54 :::
{19}
crapl 639.15 w 708 & 875.15.odt
sentence as below :-
Section 3 in The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [Entire Act]
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Mukesh Kumar vs State Of Chattisgarh 8 Wpc/184/2018 ... on 24 January, 2018
The learned Sessions Judge observed
that the prosecutrix was subjected to physical relations on multiple
occasions under threats. She was ravished by the accused time and
again much prior to her medical check-up by PW-9 Dr. Hange.
Therefore, obviously there would not be any kind of injuries on the
::: Uploaded on - 19/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 19/04/2020 21:33:54 :::
{13}
crapl 639.15 w 708 & 875.15.odt
private parts of the prosecutrix or any marks of violence on her body.
Moreover, the learned Sessions Judge has rightly placed reliance on
legal guidelines delineated by Honourable Apex Court in Mukesh
Vs. State of Chattisgarh, reported in 2014 SCC 3874 as well
as State of Maharashtra Vs. Nanumanth Khairate reported in
2002 Cri.L.J.4239, in which it was held that the absence of medical
evidence does not itself sufcient to discredit the version of
prosecutrix.