Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.26 seconds)

The Municipal Coulcil And Another vs Tulsidas Baliram Bindhade on 22 July, 2016

In support of her submissions, she relied on the judgments in State of Karnataka vs Umadevi, 2006 (4) SCC 1, Sandip Balram Bhor vs Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, 2016 (3) MhLJ 562, Municipal Council Tirora vs Tulsidas Bindhade, 2016 (6) 5 ::: Uploaded on - 03/02/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 03/02/2026 20:51:47 ::: wp8052-2005-J.doc MhLJ 867, and Medical Superintendent Rural Hospital vs Rajashree Yadav, 2024 SCC OnLine Bombay 1929.

Secretary, State Of Karnataka And ... vs Umadevi And Others on 10 April, 2006

In support of her submissions, she relied on the judgments in State of Karnataka vs Umadevi, 2006 (4) SCC 1, Sandip Balram Bhor vs Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, 2016 (3) MhLJ 562, Municipal Council Tirora vs Tulsidas Bindhade, 2016 (6) 5 ::: Uploaded on - 03/02/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 03/02/2026 20:51:47 ::: wp8052-2005-J.doc MhLJ 867, and Medical Superintendent Rural Hospital vs Rajashree Yadav, 2024 SCC OnLine Bombay 1929.

Medical Superintendent Rural ... vs Rajashree Lakshman Yadav on 19 December, 2019

18. The judgment in Rajashree Yadav(Supra) has exhaustively considered this issue. The Division Bench decision in Municipal Council, Tirora was treated as binding authority on the point that mere completion of 240 days of service does not, by itself, create a right to permanency in public employment where no sanctioned vacancy exists. The reasoning proceeds on first principles.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S C Gupte - Full Document
1