Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.42 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Scheduled Tribes And Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition Of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Section 2 in The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
Sudiep Shrivastava vs Union Of India on 8 August, 2019
17. That apart, it is also undisputed that the Writ Petition (Civil) No.
510/2023, in the matter of Sudiep Shrivastava Vs. Union of India & Ors.
with the following parties and the prayer is pending before the Hon'ble
Supreme Court:
Forest Right Committee Ghatbarra vs Union Of India on 30 September, 2022
18. There is yet another writ petition on the same subject matter
pending before the Chhattisgarh High Court. The Respondent No. 4
along-with the affidavit dated 21.04.2025 has also placed on record a
copy of the Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1346/2016 in the matter of Forest
Right Committee vs. Union of India & Ors. The details of the parties and
the prayer clause in that petition are as under:
A. Anita Rao & Another vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 2 June, 2021
24. Submission of Counsel for the proposed intervener in IA No.
137/2024 is that there is no valid order under Section 2 of the Forest
Conservation Act, 1980 presently in force. The Central Zonal Bench of the
Tribunal in the matter of Anita & Anr. (supra) has already recorded that
the due permission was taken by the authorities concerned for the project
and for cutting of the trees and no violation was reported in the joint
committee. That apart, if the intervener has any such grievance, he can
raise the same in the pending writ petition.
State Of H.P. & Others vs . Yogendra Mohan Sengupta on 21 October, 2022
20. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of State of Himachal
Pradesh & Ors. vs. Yogendera Mohan Sengupta & Anr. reported in (2024) 1
S.C.R. 973 :2024 INSC 30, in the case where the NGT had issued
directions even though the matter was seized before the High Court in a
Writ Petition, has held that:
1