Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.26 seconds)Finance Act, 1999
Sant Lal Gupta vs Modern Coop Group Housing Society Ltd. on 15 February, 2018
11. On behalf of Revenue, Learned Autthorized Representative,
relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sant Lal Gupta
v. Modern Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd [2010 (262) ELT 6
(SC)], contends that
'14. The Legislature in its wisdom has not enacted any
deeming provision providing that in case the resolution is not
considered and finally decided by the Registrar within a period
of six months, the resolution shall become effective and
operative. It is the exclusive prerogative of the Legislature to
create a legal fiction meaning thereby to enact a deeming
provision for the purpose of assuming the existence of a fact
which does not really exist. Even if a legal fiction is created by
the Legislature, the court has to ascertain for what purpose the
fiction is created, and it must be limited to the purpose
indicated by the context and cannot be given a larger effect.
More so, what can be deemed to exist under a legal fiction are
ST/85379/2015
10
merely facts and no legal consequences which do not flow from
the law as it stands. It is a settled legal proposition that in
absence of any statutory provision, the provision cannot be
construed as to provide for a fiction in such an eventuality.
More so, creating a fiction by judicial interpretation may
amount to legislation, a field exclusively within the domain of
the legislature.
Ajaib Singh vs Sirhind Coop. ... on 8 April, 1999
(Vide; Ajaib Singh v. Sirhind Coop. Marketing-
cum-processing Service Society Ltd. & Ors., (1999) 6 SCC 82).
Union Of India And Anr vs Deoki Nandan Aggarwal on 4 September, 1991
In Union of India & Anr. v. Deoki Nandan Aggarwal, AIR
1992 SC 96, this Court observed as under :
Imagic Creative Pvt. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes & Ors on 9 January, 2008
26. We have noticed hereinbefore that a legal fiction is
created by reason of the said provision. Such a legal fiction, as
is well known, should be applied only to the extent for which it
was enacted. It, although must be given its full effect but the
same would not mean that it should be applied beyond a point
which was not contemplated by the legislature or which would
lead to an anomaly or absurdity.'
in the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Imagic Creative Pvt
Ltd v. Commissioner of re Commercial Taxes [2008 (9) STR 337 (SC)].
Article 246 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 366 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Finance Act, 2012
Commissioner Of Service Tax, Mumbai Ii vs M/S Sgs India Pvt Ltd on 28 January, 2020
In a series of decisions commencing with that of the Hon'ble
High Court of Bombay in Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai -II
ST/85379/2015
6
v. SGS India Ltd [2014 (34) STR 554 (Bom)] and followed in
Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-IV v. ATE Enterprises Pvt Ltd
[2017-TIOL-1906-HC-MUM-ST], the factum of final delivery of the
resulting activity to India was held to be insufficient to withhold from
service rendered the benefit accruing to exporters. Therefore, taxability
is excluded if it is established that the transaction is an export.