Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.26 seconds)

Lavesh vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 31 August, 2012

It was made clear in the aforesaid case of Lavesh (supra) that when the accused is absconding and has also been declared "proclaimed offender", case of granting anticipatory bail does not arise. In this case, while laying down the law, Hon'ble Apex Court has used word "normally" in reference to the anticipatory bail application, preferred by a "proclaimed offender". Neither the provisions under Section 82 Cr.P.C. nor under Section 438 Cr.P.C. impose any restriction on the filing of anticipatory bail by an absconder. As a (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 08:03:48 PM) [2023:RJ-JP:22955] (5 of 7) [CRLMB-18043/2022] rule of thumb, it cannot be said that absconder, against whom a proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is not issued, is not entitled to get anticipatory bail.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 823 - P Sathasivam - Full Document
1