Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.22 seconds)Jyoti K.K. And Ors. vs Kerala Public Service Commission And ... on 13 March, 2002
It was in the context of specific rule that the
decision in Jyoti K.K. [Jyoti K.K. v. Kerala Public Service
Commission, (2010) 15 SCC 596 : (2013) 3 SCC (L&S)
664] turned.
Section 4 in The National Council For Teacher Education Act, 1993 [Entire Act]
Section 12 in The National Council For Teacher Education Act, 1993 [Entire Act]
Zahoor Ahmad Rather And Others vs State Of J&K; And Others on 1 August, 2017
In this view of the matter, the Division Bench [Imtiyaz
Ahmad v. Zahoor Ahmad Rather, LPA (SW) No. 135 of
2017, decided on 12-10-2017 (J&K)] of the High Court
was justified in reversing the judgment [Zahoor Ahmad
Rather v. State of J&K, 2017 SCC OnLine J&K 936] of
the learned Single Judge and in coming to the
conclusion that the appellants did not meet the
prescribed qualifications.
State Of U.P vs Shiv Kumar Pathak on 25 July, 2017
In support of the
aforesaid submission, learned Senior Counsel has placed
reliance on a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Shiv Kumar Pathak 1.
The University Grants Commission Act, 1956
Section 32 in The National Council For Teacher Education Act, 1993 [Entire Act]
Shiekh Imtiyaz Ahmad & Ors vs Zahoor Ahmad Rather And Ors on 23 August, 2017
We find no error in the
decision [Imtiyaz Ahmad v. Zahoor Ahmad Rather, LPA
(SW) No. 135 of 2017, decided on 12-10-2017 (J&K)] of
the Division Bench.
Abhijit Madhavrao Patil And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 7 October, 2022
12. On the other hand, learned Special Government
Pleader has submitted that Sections 12 and 12A of the
NCTE Act only empower the NCTE to lay down the
minimum standard of education and the NCTE has
prescribed the minimum standards of education.
Therefore, it is open for the State Government to prescribe
1
(2018) 12 SCC 595
13
the higher qualification. It is also submitted that by
enacting the 2017 Rules, the Government has not
prescribed any qualification which is at variance with the
qualification prescribed by the NCTE. It is also pointed out
that the validity of the 2017 Rules was assailed before a
Division Bench of this Court and the Division Bench by a
common order dated 18.12.2017 passed in W.P.Nos.40590
and 40936 of 2017 has disposed of the writ petitions
directing the respondents therein to examine whether or
not the qualification secured by the petitioners therein was
equivalent to a Bachelor's Degree in Hindi. Learned
Special Government Pleader has also placed reliance on the
decision of the High Court of Bombay in Abhijit
Madhavrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra 2.