Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (1.35 seconds)
Wendger And Co. And Others vs District Valuation Officer, New Delhi ... on 30 August, 1978 cites

Dewan Daulat Ram Kapur vs New Delhi Municipal Committee And Anr. on 16 November, 1972

According to the petitioners the valuation should have been done on the basis of the annual letting value fixed for the tenanted portions and self-occupied portion by the New Delhi Municipal Committee in consonance with the principles laid down by a Full Bench of this court in Dewan Daulat Ram Kapur v. New Delhi Municipal Committee, 2nd [1973] 1 Delhi 363. The contention is that the fair market value is dependent on the standard rent which can be charged for the various portions of the building and a hypothetical purchaser would keep that in view in quoting his price. Though some portions of the building are self-occupied the major part of this portion was originally on rent with the petitioners and, therefore, the rent that the hypothetical purchaser would be able to get for that portion would be the same as was the standard rent. Capitalisation of the standard rent would thus, according to the petitioners, be the best way of finding out the fair market value. As we have noticed earlier, the standard rent and the annual letting value been taken as the basis for fixing the fair market value by respondent No. 1 of the tenanted portion. But that basis is not adopted for the owner occupied portion.
Delhi High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

A. K. Kraipak & Ors. Etc vs Union Of India & Ors on 29 April, 1969

They are also entitled to show that his approach is conjectural and not objective. It may, perhaps, be going too far to say that the proceedings before respondent No. 1 are quasi-judicial proceedings but it may not be inappropriate to hold that the power exercised by respondent No. 1 is a quasi-judicial power and not mere administrative power. Indeed, the dividing line between administrative power and quasi-judicial power is gradually being obliterated. As was observed by the Supreme Court in A. K. Kraipak v. Union of India, AIR 1970 SC 150, 154 :
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 1426 - Full Document
1