Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.23 seconds)Section 3 in The Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 22 in The Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
The Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1973
Article 239 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ram Puri, Chandigarh vs Chief Commissioner, Chandigarh And ... on 18 February, 1982
"40. The issue in the light of the decision of the Full Bench
of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Ram Puri v. Chief
Commr., Chandigarh case (supra) as affirmed by this Court
in Babu Singh Bains v. Union of India(1996) 6 SCC 565 may
have to be considered from another angle.
Jagdish Chand Radhey Shyam vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 6 September, 1972
"(9) Now apart from the above the subsequent amendments
introduced in sections 3 and 8 as also the deletion of
section 9 altogether and its substitution by section 8-A of
the Act was designed to and has undoubtedly cured the
infirmities which their Lordships had discerned in the
previous provisions in Jagdish Chand-Radhey Shyam Vs.
The State of Punjab & others AIR 1972 SC 2587. By
these legislative changes the charge on the transferred site
has been abolished and similarly the clog on the transfer to
the third party stands removed.