Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (1.31 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Satyajit Kumar Sah vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 2 September, 2015
(i) As to how many candidates have been recommended /
appointed prior to passing of the order by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Satyajit 7 Kumar & Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors,
rendered in Civil Appeal No. 4038 of 2022
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 142 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Satyajit Kumar vs The State Of Jharkhand on 2 August, 2022
34. This Court is bound to take serious notice of this
fact that in-spite of various and repeated orders passed by
this Court; the respondents have failed to publish and
produce the 'State Wise Merit List' which they were bound to
prepare before making appointments as per the verdict of the
Hon'ble Apex Court dated 02.08.2022 in Civil Appeal No.
4038/2022 (Satyajit Kumar & Ors. v. State of Jharkhand).
Vijay Kumar Soni vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors. on 27 January, 2016
Para 22 -"That it is not out of place to mention here that
9590 candidates against the vacancies of the direct
recruitment and 324 candidates against the vacancies of
the Primary Trained Teacher i.e. altogether 9914 candidates
were already recommended by the JSSC on the basis of
District wise Merit list prior to passing the Final order dated
21.09.2020 by the Hon'ble full Bench in W.P(C) No.
1387/2017 (Soni Kumari Vs State of Jharkhand and Ors)
and analogous cases out of which recommendation in
respect of 289 candidates were returned back by the
Department after passing the aforesaid orders dated
02.08.2022, 02.12.2022 and 15.12.2022 by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court."
Soni Kumari vs K Ravi Kumar on 16 October, 2023
The 'Merit List' as was directed to be prepared as
per orders dated 02.12.2022 & 15.12.2022 passed by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in Cont. Pet. (C) No. 612/2022 (Soni
Kumari v. K. Ravi Kumar & Ors.) have also not been produced
or brought on record. At the cost of repetition, the so-called
Merit list produced before this Court in four volumes are full
of discrepancies and the Ld. Advocate General has also
admitted that since the details were collected from various
districts of the State; such typographical errors might have
taken place which can be ignored.
Nirmal Soni ? Nirmal Kumar Soni & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 4 August, 2015
The affidavits filed by the Respondents even claims
as if all the recommendations made by JSSC in the year 2019
and prior to 18.09.2019, the date on which stay was granted
by this Court in Soni Kumari case has been protected by the
Hon'ble Apex Court, which is not the case.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
1