Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.17 seconds)Section 60 in Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882
Section 54 in Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 41 in Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960
The Karnataka Small Cause Courts Act, 1964
Balkrishna Sakalchand Shah vs Mohamed Ikbal Mohmed Husen on 25 March, 1976
He ought not to have disposed of the application. He ought to have placed the matter before a Judge of the court who could have disposed of the same. On that ground itself, the order under revision deserves to be set aside. This proposition has been clearly laid down by a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court in Balkrishna v. Mohd. Ikbal A.I.R. 1977 Guj. 160. The relevant passage in the judgment is found in paragraph 6 of the judgment which reads thus:
Section 62 in Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
1