Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 70 (0.85 seconds)Section 102 in Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 [Entire Act]
M/S Sarpanch Int Udyog vs State Of U.P. And Others on 3 September, 2010
99.S.B.C.W.P. No. 11837/2012 - M/s Poonia Int Udyog Vs. State & Ors.
M/S. Kejariwal Laghu Grihi Ent Udyog vs State Of U.P. & Ors. on 15 July, 2010
124.S.B.C.W.P. No. 12723/2012 - M/s Prince Ent Udyog Vs. State & Ors.
M/S Ganga Int Udyog And Others vs Union Of India And Others on 7 December, 2012
126.S.B.C.W.P. No. 12886/2012 - M/s Balaji Int Udyog Vs. State & Ors.
Sanjay Kumar Purohit & Ors vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 15 January, 2009
122.S.B.C.W.P. No. 12225/2012 - Rajni Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.
Section 15 in The Rajasthan Colonisation Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
Mohd. Bux vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 22 February, 1993
Meaning thereby, the
petitioner is having mining lease granted by the Mining
Department, therefore, they are in lawful possession of
the land, as such, the order which is passed by the
District Collector for the recovery of the amount cannot
be termed as a legal order because in the said order, it
is observed by the District Collector that the petitioner
is in illegal possession and utilizing the said land for
the purpose of construction of bricks knowingly well
that after judgment of Mohd. Bux's case (supra) Mining
Department is having jurisdiction to make allotment of
lease and there is no jurisdiction left with the Collector
to make allotment of lease for brick kilns.