Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.47 seconds)Section 27 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Section 21 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Uttam Namdeo Mahale vs Vithal Deo & Ors on 7 May, 1997
In support of his submission, he has placed reliance on the case of Uttam Namdeo Mahale Vs. Vithal Deo and others (1997) 6 Supreme Court Cases 73, in which the Honble Supreme Court has observed as follows: -
Hukam Raj Khinvsara vs Union Of India & Ors on 17 March, 1997
(a) in a case where a final order such as is mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 20 has been made in connection with the grievance unless the application is made, within one year from the date on which such final order has been made.
In support of his contention, learned counsel for the respondents has placed reliance on the observation made by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Hukam Raj Khinvsara Vs. Union of India and others (1997) 4 Supreme Court Cases 284. The Honble Supreme Court has observed in the aforesaid case, on the point of limitation, as follows: -
Maharashtra Court-fees Act.
Jethmal & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 November, 2009
By Honble Mr. Justice S.S. Tiwari, Sr. J.M./H.O.D.
This Civil Misc. Execution Application has been filed by the applicants under Sections 22, 27 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 read with Rule 24 of the C.A.T. (Procedure) Rules, 1987 and Order 21 Rules 10, 11 (2) 22 of the C.P.C. for a direction to the respondents to execute the Tribunals Order dated 21.03.2001 passed in O.A. No. 1111/2000 Satyapal Singh and 10 others Vs. Union of India and others or, to issue summon to the respondents/Judgment debtors for attachment of their salary and allowances, who are found responsible for not executing the aforesaid Order.