Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.44 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 411 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 392 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 311 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Ripen Kumar vs Department Of Customs on 12 October, 2000
In view of the observations laid down by Hon'ble High
Court of Delhi, it is clear that the complainant was not fully cross
examined by ld. Defence Counsel and thus, reliance on his
testimony cannot be placed. Furthemore, it has already stated by
PW5/IO SI Laxman that the case property was released by him.
However, the case property was produced before the Court, for
the first time on 26.10.2018 and the same was produced in
unsealed condition. It is apparent from the record that the case
property was never seized by the investigating officer. Hence, the
possibility of case property be tampered/manipulated at a later
stage cannot be ruled out.
1