Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.41 seconds)The West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956.
Section 6 in The West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 [Entire Act]
Section 91 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 92 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Rajrup Koer vs Abul Hossein And Ors. on 14 July, 1880
To substantiate the argument that it is settled law that long user gives rise to
and matures into grant of absolute an indefeasible right of such user, Mr. Mitra, the
Learned Senior Counsel referred to Maharani Rajroop Koer Vs. Syed Abul
Hossein [(1879-80) 7 IA (Indian Appeals) 240]; Kunjammal Vs. Rathnam
Pillai [AIR 1922 Mad 5]; Kasi Nath Bhattacharjee & Ors. Vs. Murai
Chandra Pal [AIR 1920 Cal 361); Manmatha Nath Vs. Rakhal Chandra
Mandal & Ors. (AIR 1933 CAL 215); Umade Rajaha Raje Vs. Ardhamala
Yagadu & Ors. (AIR 1937 Mad 953).
Kunjammal And Three Ors. vs Rathinam Pillai on 12 December, 1921
To substantiate the argument that it is settled law that long user gives rise to
and matures into grant of absolute an indefeasible right of such user, Mr. Mitra, the
Learned Senior Counsel referred to Maharani Rajroop Koer Vs. Syed Abul
Hossein [(1879-80) 7 IA (Indian Appeals) 240]; Kunjammal Vs. Rathnam
Pillai [AIR 1922 Mad 5]; Kasi Nath Bhattacharjee & Ors. Vs. Murai
Chandra Pal [AIR 1920 Cal 361); Manmatha Nath Vs. Rakhal Chandra
Mandal & Ors. (AIR 1933 CAL 215); Umade Rajaha Raje Vs. Ardhamala
Yagadu & Ors. (AIR 1937 Mad 953).
Sri Shivaji Balaram Haibatti vs Sri Avinash Maruthi Pawar on 20 November, 2017
Mr. Mitra referred to Shivaji Balaram
Haibatti Vs. Avinash Maruthi Pawar [(2018) 11 SCC 652]. According to Mr.
Mitra, Section 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act, 1872 are not applicable.
The Companies Act, 1956
Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. & Anr vs The State Of Gujarat And Another on 12 September, 1974
Mr. Mitra also
referred to The Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. The State of Gujarat
& Ors. (AIR 1975 SC 32), Balaram Agasti & Ors. Vs. Ramesh Chandra
Mohanty (AIR 1973 Orissa 13) and Des Raj Vs. Kulwant Singh & Ors.
[(2003) 135 PLR 601] were relied upon.