Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.41 seconds)

Rajrup Koer vs Abul Hossein And Ors. on 14 July, 1880

To substantiate the argument that it is settled law that long user gives rise to and matures into grant of absolute an indefeasible right of such user, Mr. Mitra, the Learned Senior Counsel referred to Maharani Rajroop Koer Vs. Syed Abul Hossein [(1879-80) 7 IA (Indian Appeals) 240]; Kunjammal Vs. Rathnam Pillai [AIR 1922 Mad 5]; Kasi Nath Bhattacharjee & Ors. Vs. Murai Chandra Pal [AIR 1920 Cal 361); Manmatha Nath Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mandal & Ors. (AIR 1933 CAL 215); Umade Rajaha Raje Vs. Ardhamala Yagadu & Ors. (AIR 1937 Mad 953).
Calcutta High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 50 - Full Document

Kunjammal And Three Ors. vs Rathinam Pillai on 12 December, 1921

To substantiate the argument that it is settled law that long user gives rise to and matures into grant of absolute an indefeasible right of such user, Mr. Mitra, the Learned Senior Counsel referred to Maharani Rajroop Koer Vs. Syed Abul Hossein [(1879-80) 7 IA (Indian Appeals) 240]; Kunjammal Vs. Rathnam Pillai [AIR 1922 Mad 5]; Kasi Nath Bhattacharjee & Ors. Vs. Murai Chandra Pal [AIR 1920 Cal 361); Manmatha Nath Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mandal & Ors. (AIR 1933 CAL 215); Umade Rajaha Raje Vs. Ardhamala Yagadu & Ors. (AIR 1937 Mad 953).
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 13 - Full Document
1   2 Next