State of West Bengal - Act
The West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956.
WEST BENGAL
India
India
The West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956.
Act 12 of 1956
- Published on 30 March 1956
- Commenced on 30 March 1956
- [This is the version of this document from 30 March 1956.]
- [Note: The original publication document is not available and this content could not be verified.]
Chapter I
Preliminary.
1. Short title, commencement and extent.
2. Definitions.
- In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context, -3. Certain provisions of the Act not to apply to certain leases.
- [(1) The provisions relating to rent and the provisions of sections 31 and 36 shall apply to any premises held under a lease for residential purpose of the lessee himself and registered under the Indian Registration Act, 1908, where -(a)such lease has been entered into on or after the 1st December, 1948, and(b)such lease is for a period of not more than 20 years,and save as aforesaid nothing in this Act shall apply to any premises held under a lease for a period of not less than 15 years.] [Section 3 renumbered as sub-section (1) of that section and sub-section (2) inserted by W.B. Act 29 of 1965.]Chapter II
Provisions regarding rent.
4. Excess over fair rent to be irrecoverable.
5. Restriction on claim, demand or receipt of premium or other consideration.
- No person shall, in consideration of the grant, renewal or continuance of a tenancy of any premises, -6. Restriction on the sale of furniture in any premises let to a tenant.
7. Refund of rent, premium, etc., not recoverable under the Act.
8. Fair rent.
9. Increase of fair rent in certain cases.
- The fair rent of any premises shall be liable to be increased on any of the following grounds and to the extent indicated below -10. Controller to fix or increase fair rent on application by landlord or tenant.
- The Controller shall, on application made to him either by landlord or by the tenant in the prescribed manner, fix in respect of any premises -11. Revision of fair rent.
12. When fair rent fixed by the Controller, takes effect.
- When in fixing the fair rent or any increase of rent under section 9 or revising the fair rent under section 11, the rent which was being paid at the time of the application is -Chapter III
Suits and proceedings for eviction.
13. Protection of tenant against eviction.
14. Restriction on subletting.
15. Tenant not to receive any sum or consideration for relinquishment of tenancy.
- It shall not be lawful for the tenant or any other person acting or purporting to act on behalf of the tenant to claim or receive any sum or any consideration as a condition of the relinquishment of his tenancy of any premises.16. Creation and termination of sub-tenancies to be notified.
17. When a tenant can get the benefit of protection against eviction.
17A. Power of Court to set aside order striking out defence against delivery of possession.
| Section 17A first inserted by W.B. Act 29 of 1965, then present sections 17A to 17C substituted by W.B. Act 30 of 1969. Previous section 17A was as under :-"17A. Power of Court to set aside decree or order for ejectment in certain cases.- (1) Where any decree or order for the recovery of possession of any premises has been made in a suit or proceeding in which the defence against delivery of possession was struck out by an order under sub-section (3) of section 17, but the possession of such premises has not been recovered from the tenant by the execution of such decree or order, the tenant may make an application to the Court which made such decree or order within a period of sixty days from the commencement of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy (Amendment) Ordinance, 1965, for setting aside such decree or order.(2) All proceedings in execution of such decree or order shall remain stayed during the period referred to in sub-section (1) and, where an application under that sub-section has been made by the tenant within such period, until such application is disposed of by the Court.(3) On receipt of an application under sub-section (1) the Court shall cause notice thereof to be served on the landlord, and if after considering such evidence as the parties may adduce, -(a) the Court is satisfied that the order Striking out the defence against delivery of possession would have been made in the suit or proceeding under sub-section (3) of section 17 even if the West Bengal Premises Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1965, had been in force on the date on which such order was made, the Court shall dismiss the application with such costs as the Court may award to the landlord ; or(b) the Court is satisfied that no order striking out the defence against delivery of possession would have been made in the suit or proceeding under sub-section (3) of section 17 if the West Bengal Premises Tenancy (Amendment) Act, 1965, had been in force on the date on which such order was made, the Court shall determine the amount which would have been payable by the tenant for the period commencing from such date and ending with the date of the order to be made under this sub-section, if the tenant had to pay, month by month, a sum equivalent to the rent at the rate at which it was last paid, and after deducting therefrom all such sums as the tenant may have deposited in Court or with the Controller or paid to the landlord for such period, the Court shall direct the tenant, by order, to deposit the remaining amount in Court within thirty days from the date of the order.(4) If the tenant deposits the amount ordered by the Court under clause (b) of sub-section (3) within the time specified therein, the Court shall allow the application under sub-section (1) and set aside the decree or order made in the suit or proceeding and the order made under sub-section (3) of section 17 striking out the defence against delivery of possession, and fix a date for proceeding with the hearing of the suit or proceeding.(5) If the tenant fails to deposit the amount ordered by the Court under clause (6) of sub-section (3) within the time specified therein, his application under sub-section (1) shall be dismissed with such costs as the Court may award to the landlord.'. |