Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.19 seconds)Sadhu Singh Roda S/O Buta Singh Etc vs State Of Punjab on 25 January, 1984
In case law reported as "Sadhu Singh Vs. State of Punjab", 1997(3)
Crimes 55 of the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court observed as under:
State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors vs Shri Dharam Das on 25 August, 1995
In a case titled "State of Himachal Pradesh v/s Dharam Dass", 1992(1)
C.L.R, it has been ruled that the prosecution has to prove the guilt against beyond all
reasonable doubt and that too by leading independent, reliable and unimpeachable
evidence. There is no controversy to the proposition that the accused is entitled to the
FIR No. 356/03 11/12
benefit of every doubt occurring in the prosecution case.
Section 1 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
Section 61 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
Roop Chand And Others vs The State Of Haryana on 16 March, 2009
In a case law reported as "Roop Chand Vs. The State of Haryana",
1999(1) C.L.R 69, the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court held as under: