Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.23 seconds)

H.P.Public Service Commission vs Mukesh Thakur & Anr on 25 May, 2010

14. Though re-evaluation can be directed if rules permit, this Court has deprecated the practice of re- evaluation and scrutiny of the questions by the courts which lack expertise in academic matters. It is not permissible for the High Court to examine the question papers and answer sheets itself, particularly when the Commission has assessed the inter se merit of the candidates (Himachal Pradesh Public Service Commission v. Mukesh Thakur (2010) 6 SCC 759.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 842 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Maharashtra State Board Of Secondary ... vs Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth Etc on 17 July, 1984

In Central Board of Secondary Education through Secretary, All India Pre-Medical/Pre- Dental Entrance Examination and others vs. Khushboo Shrivastava and others (2014) 14 SCC 523, the Hon'ble Supreme Court while noticing the judgment in Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education case (supra) has held as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 990 - V B Eradi - Full Document

Vikash Kumar Gupta vs State Of Raj And Ors on 27 July, 2021

6. We may, at this stage, refer to a fairly recent judgment rendered by three Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vikesh Kumar Gupta and another vs. State of Rajasthan and others (2021) 2 SCC 309 wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that though re-evaluation can be directed, if rules permit, however, deprecated the practice of re-evaluation and scrutiny of the questions by the Courts which lack expertise and it was further held that it was not permissible for the High Court to examine the question papers and answer sheets itself, particularly, when ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:16:43 :::CIS 7 the Commission had assessed the inter se merit of the candidates. Courts have to show deference and .
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 0 - Cited by 111 - I Singh - Full Document

Richal vs Rajasthan Public Service Commission on 3 May, 2018

Reliance was placed by the Appellants on Richal v. Rajasthan Public Service Commission (2018) 8 SCC 81. In the said judgment, this Court interfered with the selection process only after obtaining the opinion of an expert committee but did not enter into the correctness of the questions and answers by itself. Therefore, the said judgment is not relevant for adjudication of the dispute in this case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 205 - A Bhushan - Full Document
1   2 Next