Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)
G.Ravichandran vs V.Devendiran on 18 June, 2019 cites

R. Saravanan vs P.N.Peruvazhuthi on 10 November, 2009

5. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/ plaintiff relied on the decision in R.Sarvanan vs. R.N.Peruvazhuthi reported in 2009 (5) CTC 593 and contended that court could resort to comparison of signatures and arrive at its own conclusion when other materials produced and evidence adduced are corroborative of such comparison. He would further contend that in the instant case, the respondent/plaintiff and other http://www.judis.nic.in 4 witnesses have not been examined and if at all a court comes to a conclusion that sending the Promissory Note for expert opinion is inevitable, then the court can send the Promissory Note along with the admitted signature after the execution of witness on the side of the respondent/plaintiff. His specific contention is that the petition filed by the revision petitioner/ defendant at this stage is premature.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 2 - R Banumathi - Full Document
1