Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.21 seconds)
A.V.Abdul Gafoor vs The Divisional Forest Officer on 26 November, 2020 cites

Bharat Singh & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 13 September, 1988

In Bharat Singh v. State of Haryana [(1988) 4 SCC 534] the Apex Court held that, when a point which is ostensibly a point of law is required to be substantiated by facts, the party raising the point, if he is the writ petitioner, must plead and prove such facts by evidence which must appear from the writ petition and if he is the respondent, from the counter affidavit. If the facts are not pleaded or the evidence in support of such facts is not annexed to the writ petition or to the counter affidavit, as the case may be, the Court will not entertain the point. The Apex Court held further that there is a distinction between a pleading under the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and a writ petition or a counter-affidavit.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 425 - M M Dutt - Full Document
1   2 Next