Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.23 seconds)

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 vs L'Oreal India Pvt. Ltd on 30 August, 2019

8. For exclusion of MPS Limited, the ld. AR of the assessee submits that this comparable company is engaged in business of software development and providing technology solution for publishing industry. MPS Limited is professional expertise, having Caliber Professional employee who have undertaken various research and development initiatives to develop end - to- end cloud based publishing platform and solutions. This comparable was rejected by TPO in A.Y. 2014-15 after considering the submission/objection of assessee in its order dated 09.05.2017. The ld. AR submits that Hon'ble Bombay High Court in PCIT vs. J.P. Morgan Services Ltd. (ITA No.4/2017 & 170 of 2017) and in CIT vs. L'Oreal India Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No. 1046/2012) and Mumbai Tribunal in assessee's own case for A.Y. 2005-06 held that software development company cannot be compare with low and back office service provider.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 16 - Full Document

Voltas Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax. ... on 27 January, 1998

9.3 From the perusal of the annual report for the year ended 31/03/2014 of the said comparable, we find from page 707 of the paper book that the said comparable had incurred outsourcing cost of Rs. 1078.76 Crores which is included under the head "miscellaneous expenses" which goes to prove that it has got a different business model. From the various functions performed by MPS Ltd., we find that the said comparable is predominantly in the business of digital publishing which cannot be treated at par with ITeS which is the case of the assessee in ITeS segment. In this regard, we find 14 Maers k G lobal Servi ce Cen tres Ind ia Pvt. Ltd that the reliance placed by the ld. AR on the Co-ordinate Bench decision of Bangalore Tribunal in the case of Google (India) (P). Ltd., v. Dy DCIT [2013] 29 taxmann.com 412/55 SOT 489 is well founded wherein it was held as under:--
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 24 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1