Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.29 seconds)
Badrilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 May, 2025 cites

Tek Chand (Dead) By L.Rs. And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors. Etc on 31 August, 1990

05. Learned counsel for the appellants has challenged the impugned award passed by the Reference Court submitting that from the evidence available on record, the appellants had duly proved the market value of the acquired lands but the same has not been taken into consideration appropriately. The comparative sale deeds have not been taken into consideration which are mandatorily required to be considered. The award had been passed by the Land Acquisition Officer on the basis of market value guidelines, which was impermissible. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellants ought to have been awarded higher amount of compensation. It is hence submitted that the impugned award be suitably enhanced. Reliance has been placed by the learned counsel for the appellants on the decision of the Apex Court in Tek Chand Vs. Union of India 1991 (1) MPWN Note 38, Ramo Bai and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others 2016 (13) SCC 407, Mahamaya General Finance Company Limited Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others, 2014 (15) SCC 290 of this Court in Narayan Pansare Vs. State of M.P. 1984 MPWN Note 81, Nirmalabai Vs. State of M.P. 1984 MPWN Note 144, State of M.P. Vs. Km Man Bano and Others 1977 MPWN 419, Shobharam Vs. Ramati Bai 1994 (2) MP Weekly note No.204.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 34 - M H Kania - Full Document

State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors vs Vishnu Prasad Sharma And Ors on 9 February, 1966

06. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that just and fair amount of compensation has been awarded to the appellants. The amount which has been awarded is already on the higher side. There were no comparative sale deeds produced by the appellants. In fact appellants ought to have been awarded compensation on the basis of market Signature Not Verified Signed by: SHILPA NAAGDEVE Signing time: 14-May-25 11:44:48 AM 12 FA-1077-2022 value guidelines but have instead been awarded compensation on the basis of the sale deeds which were not comparable in nature. It is hence submitted that the appeals deserve to be dismissed. Reliance has been placed on the decision of the Apex Court in New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Harnand Singh (Dead) through LRs and Others 2024 SCC online SC 1691, order dated 21.03.2023 passed in F.A. No.1060 of 2019 (State of M.P. and Another Vs. Vishnu Prasad and Others), Union of India Vs. Dyagala Devamma and Others, 2018 (8) SCC 485, Haridwar Development Authority Vs. Raghubir Singh and Others 2010 (11) SCC 581.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 240 - A K Sarkar - Full Document

Union Of India vs Dyagala Devamma . on 25 July, 2018

06. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that just and fair amount of compensation has been awarded to the appellants. The amount which has been awarded is already on the higher side. There were no comparative sale deeds produced by the appellants. In fact appellants ought to have been awarded compensation on the basis of market Signature Not Verified Signed by: SHILPA NAAGDEVE Signing time: 14-May-25 11:44:48 AM 12 FA-1077-2022 value guidelines but have instead been awarded compensation on the basis of the sale deeds which were not comparable in nature. It is hence submitted that the appeals deserve to be dismissed. Reliance has been placed on the decision of the Apex Court in New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Harnand Singh (Dead) through LRs and Others 2024 SCC online SC 1691, order dated 21.03.2023 passed in F.A. No.1060 of 2019 (State of M.P. and Another Vs. Vishnu Prasad and Others), Union of India Vs. Dyagala Devamma and Others, 2018 (8) SCC 485, Haridwar Development Authority Vs. Raghubir Singh and Others 2010 (11) SCC 581.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 26 - A M Sapre - Full Document

Haridwar Development ... vs Raghubir Singh, Etc on 29 January, 2010

06. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that just and fair amount of compensation has been awarded to the appellants. The amount which has been awarded is already on the higher side. There were no comparative sale deeds produced by the appellants. In fact appellants ought to have been awarded compensation on the basis of market Signature Not Verified Signed by: SHILPA NAAGDEVE Signing time: 14-May-25 11:44:48 AM 12 FA-1077-2022 value guidelines but have instead been awarded compensation on the basis of the sale deeds which were not comparable in nature. It is hence submitted that the appeals deserve to be dismissed. Reliance has been placed on the decision of the Apex Court in New Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Harnand Singh (Dead) through LRs and Others 2024 SCC online SC 1691, order dated 21.03.2023 passed in F.A. No.1060 of 2019 (State of M.P. and Another Vs. Vishnu Prasad and Others), Union of India Vs. Dyagala Devamma and Others, 2018 (8) SCC 485, Haridwar Development Authority Vs. Raghubir Singh and Others 2010 (11) SCC 581.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 473 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next