Umabai Ramkrishna Deshmukh vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 4 July, 2019
-- 10 -- WP No.4849.2024 (J).doc
pensionary benefits on the grounds that they did not possess the
qualification of "Trained Teacher". This Court after considering the
same held that petitioners therein though did not possess requisite
qualification of "Trained Teacher", but they were treated as regular
employees working and on officiating, substantive vacant post till the
age of their retirement and therefore, would be entitled for pension and
pensionary benefits and had directed the respondents to consider case
of the petitioners for grant of pensionary benefits.
(20) Similarly, in the case of Anjali Kando (supra), the
husband of the petitioner therein had completed 28 years of service,
therefore, this Court had held that husband of the petitioner had
completed the qualifying service of 20 years and thus, the case was
covered by the judgment in Umabai Deshmukh(supra) and therefore,
directed the respondent No.2, Chief Executive Officer to forthwith
release the family pension and other pensionary benefits in favour of
the petitioner therein.