Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)

J N Jagani & 28 vs State Of Gujarat Through The Additional ... on 8 August, 2016

" 7. Having heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and having gone through the material on record, the Court found that respondents have not been able to point out any dissimilarity or discriminatory feature than what has been decided by coordinate Bench of this Court and, therefore, with limited scope of an issue, the Page 3 of 6 Downloaded on : Sat Dec 24 22:14:30 IST 2022 C/SCA/13873/2022 ORDER DATED: 29/07/2022 Court found that the case is made out by the petitioner. While arriving at this conclusion, the Court is considering the observations which have been made by a decision in case of Special Civil Application No.6289 of 2011 reported in case as referred above [J.N.Jagani vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2016 (0) AIJEL - HC 236643], the relevant paras contained therein are reproduced hereinafter.
Gujarat High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 24 - A Kumari - Full Document
1