Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.42 seconds)Section 304 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 504 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan vs State Of U.P. & Others on 7 May, 2015
Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Maroof vs State Of U.P. And Another on 5 April, 2021
Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Amit Kumar vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 28 November, 2007
Father Mahendra Shukla Vs. State of U.P. and Another) and Amit Kumar Vs. State of U.P. 2010(71) ACC 209 decided on 02.07.2015.
Sadhu Saran Singh vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 26 February, 2016
Gravity of the offence has not been mentioned as a ground to reject the bail. It is not a relevant factor while considering to grant bail to the juvenile. It has been so held by this Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar alias Sadhu Vs. State of U.P. 2010 (68) ACC 616(LB); Abdullah @ Abdul Hassan Vs. State of U.P. and Others [2015 (90) ACC 204]; Maroof Vs. State of U.P. and Another [2015 (6) ADJ 203]; Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2015 (Suraj @ Ashok Sukla Thru.
Rohit @ Deshraj (Second Bail) vs The State Of U.P. on 8 February, 2016
The present criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 4.9.2021 passed by Additional Special Judge (POCSO)/Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur in Criminal Appeal No.01 of 2021 (Rohit @ Deshraj vs. State of U.P.) in Case Crime No.88 of 2020, under Sections 323, 304, 504 IPC, Police Station Malwan, District Fatehpur as well as against the order dated 09.12.2020 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Fatehpur.
1