Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.56 seconds)The Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950
Section 83 in Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908
Mahabir Kansi vs The State Of Jharkhand on 30 June, 2022
'It is well settled that transfer of land cannot be done by
virtue of only a Sada Hukumnama and an unregistered
Hukumnama is not admissible and cannot be considered
as a deed of title.'
It is also found in the case of Mahabir Kansi Vs. State of
Jharkhand that Sada Hukumnama cannot be relied upon
for the reason that the same can always be manufactured
and the plaintiff side has also not brought any document
to show the return filed by the Jamindar after abolition
of Jamindari& BLR Act came enforce and so after going
through the entire oral and documentary evidences and
the discussion made above I find and hold that on the
basis of Ext.7 Sada Hukumnama Devrani Devi got no
8
2025: JHHC: 14230
title of the suit land and since the vendor of plaintiff has
not got title of the suit land so the question of title to the
plaintiff on the suit land does not arise. Hence plaintiff
has failed to prove the title over the suit land. So this
issue is decided against the plaintiff and in favour of the
defendant."
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 80 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Dineshwar Prasad Sah @ Shah vs State Of Jharkhand And Ors. on 12 March, 2008
For this part of my
findings the reliance may be placed upon the case of
Sri Kanak Kumari Devi and others Vs State of Jharkhand
reported in 2008 (2) JLJR 572 and also on the case
of Dineshwar Prasad Vs State of Jharkhand and others
reported in 2008 (3) JLJR 273, Smt. Gulabasi Devi Vs
State of Bihar reported in 2003 (4) JCR 41
Jharkhand. As per the facts of this case the ex-
Smt. Gulabasi Devi And Ors. vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 31 July, 2003
For this part of my
findings the reliance may be placed upon the case of
Sri Kanak Kumari Devi and others Vs State of Jharkhand
reported in 2008 (2) JLJR 572 and also on the case
of Dineshwar Prasad Vs State of Jharkhand and others
reported in 2008 (3) JLJR 273, Smt. Gulabasi Devi Vs
State of Bihar reported in 2003 (4) JCR 41
Jharkhand. As per the facts of this case the ex-
Suresh Urawan & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 2 March, 2012
1 to 3 with Exhibit-A and B, it appeared that the
disputed land was government land and Government of Bihar has title
and possession over the land and after inviting objection from the
general public, the land was transferred to defendant Nos. 4 and 5. The
learned trial court recorded that admittedly the disputed land was
recorded as Gair Abad Malik land and it appeared that it was
transferred to Devrani Devi through Sada Hukumnama (Exhibit-7)
and it was not registered. Thereafter, the learned trial court referred to
the judgment passed by this Court reported in (2009) 4 JLJR 106
(Mahadeo Urawan vs. State of Bihar & Others) wherein it was
observed that Sada Hukumnama being an unregistered Hukumnama is
not admissible and cannot be considered as a deed of title.