Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.23 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Punjab Excise Act, 1914
Section 1 in The Punjab Excise Act, 1914 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Punjab Excise Act, 1914 [Entire Act]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Davinder Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 10 September, 2010
5. Reliance was accordingly placed on the judgment of the Apex
Court in Davinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others 2010(13)
SCC 88, wherein the services of the Home Guards were terminated on account
of the fact that they were involved in an act of indiscipline at the Amritsar
Railway Station while travelling in connection with election duty. The Apex
Court accordingly held that without giving an opportunity, terminating their
services was not justified. Relevant paragraphs of the judgment cited (supra)
read as under:-
Grah Rakshak, Home Guards Welfare ... vs State Of H.P . on 19 August, 2015
7. The argument that has been raised qua the respondent only being
a daily wager and the financial benefits have been granted to him from the date
of his representation made on 13.03.2019, also does not cut much ice with us.
The Apex Court in a subsequent judgment in Grah Rakshak, Home Guards
Welfare Association vs. State of H.P. and others (2015) 6 SCC 247, while
noticing that it is a constitution of volunteer corps and Home Guards are not
regular employees of the State, however, has issued directions that though
regularization of services cannot be done but the fact is that the State
Government should pay duty allowances at such rates, total of which 30 days
(a month) comes to minimum of the pay, to which the police personnel of the
State are entitled and the State Government should pass appropriate orders in
terms of the aforesaid observations.
Maharashtra State Road Transport ... vs Dilip Uttam Jayabhay on 3 January, 2022
In such circumstances, once the order of discharge had been
wrongly passed without falling back upon the prescribed rules, the reliance
placed by learned counsel for the appellants upon the judgment rendered by
the Supreme Court in Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs.
Dilip Uttam Jayabhay 2022 AIR (SC) 238, would not be of much help since it
was a case where the order of dismissal passed by the Disciplinary Authority
dismissing the respondent was upheld while setting aside the judgment of the
Industrial Court.