Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)

Society For The Promotion Of Education ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central ... on 3 April, 2008

13. Before us, learned counsel for the assessee pointed out that the CIT(A) had followed the judgments of the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Society for the Promotion of Education Adventure Sport & Conservation of Environment (supra) and also that the of Special Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Bhagwad Swarup Shri Shri Devraha Baba Memorial Shri Hari Parmarth Dham Trust (supra) in concluding that non-passing of order by the Commissioner within the time-frame fixed by section 12AA(2) of the Act would amount to deemed grant of registration.
Allahabad High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 45 - Full Document

Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag & ... vs Mst. Katiji & Ors on 19 February, 1987

9. On this aspect, learned counsel pointed out that, before the CIT(A), assessee had furnished a communication dated 05.01.2001, a copy of which has been placed on record, whereby the reasons for the delay in filing of appeal before the CIT(A) were explained. The learned counsel pointed out the delay was for a period of approximately 12 months. According to the learned counsel, the reasons for the delay were bonafide and the refusal to condone the delay has perpetuated technical considerations whereas it is judicially well- settled that where technical and substantive considerations are pitted against each other, the substantive considerations be upheld, a reference was made to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Mst. Kajiji, 167 ITR 471 (SC).
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 5846 - M P Thakkar - Full Document
1   2 Next