Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.22 seconds)State Of Gujarat vs Essar Steel Ltd on 22 October, 2019
In the case of State of Gujarat Vs. Essar Steel Ltd.
(supra), Hon'ble Gujarat High Court directed refund of pre-
deposit on acceptance of the appeals and decided the issue in
favour of the assessee. In the present case, though the appeals
have not been accepted, but an analogous situation has been
created with acceptance of the Resolution Plan and
extinguishment of all debts/liabilities of the sick unit towards the
statutory creditor, i.e. the State Government/Commercial Taxes
Department.
Section 38 in The Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Ultra Tech Nathdwara Cement Ltd vs Union Of India on 7 April, 2020
The petitioner questioned validity of the demand
notices issued by the CGST Department in relation to the period
prior to the transfer date on which the petitioner took over the
company M/s Binani Cement Ltd. in proceedings under the IBC,
2016 by filing a Writ Petition No.9480/2019 (Ultra Tech
Nathdwara Cement Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.), which
was accepted by this court vide order dated 07.04.2020 by
making the following observations :-
Section 53 in The Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Ghanashyam Mishra And Sons Private ... vs Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction ... on 13 April, 2021
In the case of Ghanshyam Mishra & Sons Pvt. Ltd.
Vs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. (supra),
the Hon'ble Supreme Court examined an identical controversy and
held as below :-
Section 17 in The Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 82 in The Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
The Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003
Suvidhe Ltd. vs Union Of India on 3 February, 1996
4. Suvidhe Ltd. Vs. Union of India, 1996 (82) ELT 177
(Bom.)