Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)Section 102 in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 72B in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 72C in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Krishna Pillai Govinda Pillai vs Govinda Pillai Madhavan Pillai And Ors. on 4 September, 1970
15. It is significant to notice that in the decision
reported in Vareed Jacob v. Jayakumar [2010 (3) KLT
389], Govinda Pillai v. Madhavan Pillai [1988 (2) KLT
522] and Bhaskaran v. Aisabi [1987 (2) KLT 213] have not
been referred to at all. Considering this anomalous position,
another bench of this Court had occasion to consider the
issue.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 72 in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 72BB in Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Vareed Jacob vs E.A. Jayakumar on 7 June, 2010
In CRP No. 503/2012, disposed of by order dated
22.01.2013, the learned Judge had occasion to hold that the
the decision reported in Vareed Jacob's case (cited supra)
has to be taken only as per incuriam. Apart from the above
aspect, on the very wording of the Section itself, it does not
appear that any embargo has been placed regarding the
filing of the appeal except that the person should be an
aggrieved person. If as a matter of fact, as claimed by the
appellant before the court below, he is the son of
Muhammed Yafi, obviously, he is an aggrieved person.
1