Section 30 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Mitakshara coparcenary property or the interest of a member of a tarwad, tavazhi, illom, kutumba or kavaru in the property of the tarwad, tavazhi, illom
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1809 (5.20 seconds)Kavalappara Kottarathil Kochuni And ... vs The State Of Madras And Others on 4 May, 1960
Sthanee to be Sthanam properties in which the members of
the tarwad had not interest. Section 2 Of the Act, which
contained the substantive provision ... intermingling of
the properties of the sthanam and the properties of the
tarwad, or
(b) the members of the tarwad have been receiving main.
tenance
Section 7 in Estate Duty act, 1953 [Entire Act]
coparcenary and the sub- coparcenary. (3) If a member of any tarwad or tavaahi governed by the Marumakkattayam rule of inheritance or a member ... respect to the interest of the deceased in the property of the tarwad, tavazhi, kutumba or kavaru, as the case may be, unless the deceased
Section 7 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Succession Act, 1956
7. Devolution of interest in the property of a tarwad, tavazhi, kutumba, kavaru or illom . —
(1) When a Hindu to whom ... death an interest in the property of a tarwad, tavazhi or illom, as the case may be, his or her interest in the property shall
Karnataka Agricultural Income-Tax Act, 1957
land either in cash or kind from a tenant; (o) "Marumakkattayam tarwad or tavazhi" means a tarwad or tavazhi governed by the Madras Marumakkattayam ... provisions of this Act shall apply as if the tavazhi were a tarwad; (p) "person" means any individual or association of individuals, owning or holding
V. Venugopala Ravi Varma Rajah vs Union Of India & Anr on 26 February, 1969
Hindu undivided families
governed by the Marumakkattayam law and to the Mappilla
tarwad in North Malabar has the same characteristics in two
respects, namely ... Initially a common system of law
relating to family property of the tarwad was applicable to
Hindus and Mappillas governed
828
by the Marumakkattayam
Kunju Kesavan vs M. M. Philip I. C. S. And Ors on 8 May, 1963
impartable and was always
shared by a female of a marumakkathyam tarwad with her
thavazhee, and cited a passage from M.P. Joseph ... this' Act-
(i) by an individual member of an Ezhava
tarwad with reference to the provisions of
part
Section 39 in Estate Duty act, 1953 [Entire Act]
arising from the cesser of an interest in the property of a tarwad or tavazhi governed by the Marumakkattayam rule of inheritance
Padanathil Ruamini Amma vs P.K. Abdulla on 17 January, 1996
property in dispute originally belonged to one
Padanattil Chengottu Kunnath Tarwad. One Mohammed Haji filed
a suit being suit No. 397 of 1941 for recovery ... possession
of some properties held by this Tarwad on tenancy rights. On
12th of September, 1942 an ex party decree was passed in the
suit
Achuthan Nair vs Chinnamu Amma And Others on 13 August, 1965
Marumakkathayam Law Property whether belongs to manager
individually or to tarwad or tavazhi-Presumption.
HEADNOTE:
A suit was filed by the some members ... HELD : (i) A family governed by Marumakkathayam law is known
as a tarwad it consists of a mother and her children,
whether male or female