Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 42 (0.80 seconds)The Finance Act, 2018
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Finance Act, 2012
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University vs The Joint Director(Gst Intelligence) on 22 February, 2021
115. The views in Madurai Kamaraj University vs. Joint
Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of GST and Central
Excise, Madurai and Manonmaniam Sundaranar University vs. The
Joint Director (GST Intelligence), Coimbatore, referred to supra as
mentioned above would require a reconsideration as there is no scope for
interpretation when the language in the Notification was clear. There was
also no scope for merging to exclusion and exemption together.
Section 78 in Finance Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in Finance Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 66 in Finance Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Section 93 in Finance Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
M/S Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 October, 2011
Ltd., vs. Excise Commissioner U.P.,
1999(110)ELT 0363 S.C
xv.Calcutta Jute Manufacturing Co. vs.
Commercial Tax Officer, 1997(093)
ELT 0657 S.C
xvi.Mafatlal Industries Ltd., vs. Union of
India, 1997(089) ELT 0247 S.C
xvii.Aphali Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs.
State of Maharashtra, 1989(044) ELT
0613 S.C
xviii.Shabian Abraham vs. Collector of
Central Excise and Customs,
2017(050) STR 0241 S.C
xix.M.P.Steel Corporation vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise,
2017(050) STR 0205 S.C
xx.Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd vs. Union
of India, 2012 (027) STR 0193 S.C