Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.38 seconds)
Thakur Dass Sharma vs State And Anr. on 28 July, 2017 cites

State Of Orissa And Anr vs Saroj Kumar Sahoo on 7 December, 2005

In support of his contentions, learned counsel relies on decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in cases titled as 'State of Orissa and another v. Saroj Kumar Sahoo' reported in (2005) 13 Supreme Court Cases 540; and 'Shoraj Singh Ahlawat and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.' reported in AIR 2013 Supreme Court 52. Learned counsel prays that the instant petition deserves dismissal out rightly on afore mentioned submissions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 537 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Lokesh Kumar Jain vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 July, 2013

11. The main argument of Sunil Sethi Sr. Counsel for petitioner is that as GAD has conducted departmental enquiry with regard to allegations and found that the Chief Education Officers had no role in fixation/approval of rates, selection of items and allotment of contracts as all these items were approved by the Divisional Level Purchase Committee, and that the role of CEOs was only to place orders within the approved contract as per actual requirement of material. The court below while framing charge has not considered a document with this regard, which prosecution has itself annexed in challan. Thus, charges framed against him are not sustainable. He has also relied upon 2013 (3) RCR (Criminal) page 763 case titled Lokesh Kumar Jain v. State of Rajasthan, wherein it is held as under :-
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 144 - Full Document

P.S.Rajya vs The State Of Bihar on 9 May, 1996

In P.S. Rajya v. State of Bihar, (1996) 9 SCC 1, this Court noticed that the appellant was exonerated in the departmental proceeding in the light of report of the Central Vigilance Commission and concurred by the 561-A Cr.P.C. No.73 of 2013 Page 10 of 13 Union Public Service Commission. The criminal case was pending since long, in spite of the fact that the appellant was exonerated in the departmental proceeding for same charge.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 251 - K Venkataswami - Full Document
1