cites: 125653035

1 - 7 of 7 (0.34 seconds)

The Divisional Controller Nwkrtc vs Shri Malappa S/O Muttappa Karigar on 10 February, 2012 cites

P.S. Somanathan & Ors vs District Insurance Officers & Anr on 17 February, 2011

8. As could be seen from the dictum In the case of P.SSOMANATHAN & OTHERS VS. DISTRICT INSURANCE OFFICER & ANOTHER, the Apex Court dealing with a case of bachelor held that the age of the victim should be taken into consideration and not the age of parents. Besides, it is also held that merely because the victim is a bachelor, 50% of his monthly earnings cannot be deducted, it should be 1/31(1 only.

Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 164 - Full Document

Section 173 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 68746

The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 94259

Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009

7. Learned counsel for the Insurance Company has referred to the case of SARLA VERMA VS. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANOTHER reported in 2009 AC) 1298 and tried to distinguish these two decisions.

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 497050

Section 168 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 6092

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Viswanath Since Dead By Lrs on 14 June, 2011

Following the said decision, the learned Single Judge of this Court, in the case of ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, BANGALORE, VS. VISWANATH, held that even in the case of a bachelor, deduction should be only 1/Yt and :6: multiplier applicable should be based on the age of the claimants.

Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - N K Patil - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results