Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.20 seconds)

State Of Rajasthan & Another vs Hari Ram Nathwani & Ors on 3 September, 1975

Main thrust of the respondents' Counsel that in State of Rajasthan Vs. Hari Ram & Ors (2001(1) WLC 124), Division Bench held that those acquiring degree of B.P.Ed., are eligible for the post of PTI Gr.II & Gr.III and the decision taken by the State Government vide Circular dt.06/01/2010 is in the light of judgment (DB) in State Vs. Hari Ram (supra) holds no substance for the reason that what was examined in the judgment (supra) basically was, whether persons holding Degree of B.P.Ed., are eligible for the posts of PTI Gr.II but finally it was held that holders of B.P.Ed., are eligible for PTI Gr.II & Gr.III.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 40 - N L Untwalia - Full Document

Lalit Kumar Bairwa &Anr vs State Of Raj And Ors on 17 November, 2009

9. 15440/2010 (8006/2010) Hukam C.Meena & Ors Vs. RPSC & Ors 10.15537/2010 (8082/2010) Ratan Lal Arya Vs. State & Ors 11.16432/2010 (8817/2010) Heeralal Chouhan Vs. State & Ors 12.16048/2010 (8469/2010) Ram Pd Meena & Ors Versus RPSC & Ors 13.1725/2011 (1581/2011) Rang Lal Meena Vs. RPSC & Ors 14.2001/2011 (1844/2011) Shokeen Kr. Meena Vs. State & Ors 15.2034/2011 (1873/2011) Hanuwant S.Meena Vs. State & Ors 16.2463/2011 (2261/2011) Lalit Kr. Bairwa Vs. State & Ors 17.2533/2011 (2321/2011) Prahlad Meena Vs. State & Ors 18.2534/2011 (2322/2011) Satish C.Meena Vs. State & Ors 19.2764/2011 (2505/2011) Prabhu Lal Meena Vs. RPSC & Ors 20.1322/2011 (1220/2011) Ramesh C.Jharotiya & Ors Vs. RPSC & Ors 21.2390/2011 (2191/2011) Ram Mahesh Meena & Ors Vs. RPSC & Ors Date of Order ::: 10/05/2011 /Reportable/ Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi For Petitioners:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 0 - Cited by 22 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Badri Prasad Meena vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 20 August, 2001

9. 15440/2010 (8006/2010) Hukam C.Meena & Ors Vs. RPSC & Ors 10.15537/2010 (8082/2010) Ratan Lal Arya Vs. State & Ors 11.16432/2010 (8817/2010) Heeralal Chouhan Vs. State & Ors 12.16048/2010 (8469/2010) Ram Pd Meena & Ors Versus RPSC & Ors 13.1725/2011 (1581/2011) Rang Lal Meena Vs. RPSC & Ors 14.2001/2011 (1844/2011) Shokeen Kr. Meena Vs. State & Ors 15.2034/2011 (1873/2011) Hanuwant S.Meena Vs. State & Ors 16.2463/2011 (2261/2011) Lalit Kr. Bairwa Vs. State & Ors 17.2533/2011 (2321/2011) Prahlad Meena Vs. State & Ors 18.2534/2011 (2322/2011) Satish C.Meena Vs. State & Ors 19.2764/2011 (2505/2011) Prabhu Lal Meena Vs. RPSC & Ors 20.1322/2011 (1220/2011) Ramesh C.Jharotiya & Ors Vs. RPSC & Ors 21.2390/2011 (2191/2011) Ram Mahesh Meena & Ors Vs. RPSC & Ors Date of Order ::: 10/05/2011 /Reportable/ Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi For Petitioners:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 0 - Cited by 23 - P P Naolekar - Full Document

Ram Ratan Meena And 25 Ors. vs State And Rpsc on 23 May, 2008

9. 15440/2010 (8006/2010) Hukam C.Meena & Ors Vs. RPSC & Ors 10.15537/2010 (8082/2010) Ratan Lal Arya Vs. State & Ors 11.16432/2010 (8817/2010) Heeralal Chouhan Vs. State & Ors 12.16048/2010 (8469/2010) Ram Pd Meena & Ors Versus RPSC & Ors 13.1725/2011 (1581/2011) Rang Lal Meena Vs. RPSC & Ors 14.2001/2011 (1844/2011) Shokeen Kr. Meena Vs. State & Ors 15.2034/2011 (1873/2011) Hanuwant S.Meena Vs. State & Ors 16.2463/2011 (2261/2011) Lalit Kr. Bairwa Vs. State & Ors 17.2533/2011 (2321/2011) Prahlad Meena Vs. State & Ors 18.2534/2011 (2322/2011) Satish C.Meena Vs. State & Ors 19.2764/2011 (2505/2011) Prabhu Lal Meena Vs. RPSC & Ors 20.1322/2011 (1220/2011) Ramesh C.Jharotiya & Ors Vs. RPSC & Ors 21.2390/2011 (2191/2011) Ram Mahesh Meena & Ors Vs. RPSC & Ors Date of Order ::: 10/05/2011 /Reportable/ Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi For Petitioners:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 49 - A Rastogi - Full Document

Kallash Chandra Harijan vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 23 January, 2006

Counsel for the petitioners placed reliance upon the decision in Kailash Chand Harijan Vs. State (2006 (1) RLR 665) and further submit that those holders of D.P.Ed., or B.P.Ed., may be holders of higher qualification, as alleged but in the light of judgment (supra), are not holding equivalent qualification to C.P.Ed, being a professional qualification to hold the post of PTI Gr.III, and the directions issued by State Government vide Circular dt.06/01/2010 are in contravention of the National Council for Teacher Education Regulations, 2001; and in such circumstances, the decision taken by the respondents in treating those applicants holding qualifications of D.P.Ed./B.P.Ed., being eligible for PTI Gr.III and directing the PSC to declare result of such applicants regardless of their forum being submitted for post Code-35 or 36, is wholly arbitrary, inasmuch as the decision taken by State Government & carried out by the PSC is without application of mind & deserves to be quashed.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 16 - Cited by 201 - V Kothari - Full Document

K.Manjusree Etc vs State Of A.P & Anr on 15 February, 2008

Counsel for petitioners further submit that once the recruitment process was initiated pursuant to advertisement dt. 03/09/2008, and procedure of selection being prescribed in advance could not have been changed by the respondents at a later stage, which is impermissible under law and in support whereof, Counsel placed reliance upon a decision in K.Manjusre Vs. State of Andh.Pra. (2008(3) SCC 512).
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 638 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

State Of U.P vs Hari Ram And Others on 7 September, 1983

Main thrust of the respondents' Counsel that in State of Rajasthan Vs. Hari Ram & Ors (2001(1) WLC 124), Division Bench held that those acquiring degree of B.P.Ed., are eligible for the post of PTI Gr.II & Gr.III and the decision taken by the State Government vide Circular dt.06/01/2010 is in the light of judgment (DB) in State Vs. Hari Ram (supra) holds no substance for the reason that what was examined in the judgment (supra) basically was, whether persons holding Degree of B.P.Ed., are eligible for the posts of PTI Gr.II but finally it was held that holders of B.P.Ed., are eligible for PTI Gr.II & Gr.III.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 42 - S M Ali - Full Document

Kailash Harijan vs State Of U.P. & Another on 15 June, 2010

Be that as it may, this Court at this stage would like to record that at the same time, in Kailach C. Harijan Vs. State (2006(1) RLR 665), the Division Bench considered the question as to whether those holding degree of B.Ed., in the light of NCTE Regulations, 2001, would be considered to be eligible for the post of Teacher at a primary level under Regulations, 2001. Taking note of Regulations, 2001 the Division Bench observed that in terms of recruitment and professional qualification for Teachers in Educational Institutions, those who are holders of B.Ed., are not eligible for the Teacher at primary level and it was observed that it might be a higher qualification but is not a qualification equivalent to BSTC and the question of higher qualification is of no relevance.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 21 - Full Document
1   2 Next